Progesterona y respuesta de estrés: mecanismos de acción y sus repercusiones en rumiantes domésticos. Revisión

Autores/as

  • Aline Freitas-de-Melo Departamento de Biología Molecular y Celular, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo (11600), Uruguay. tel.: (598) 26221195, alinefreitasdemelo@hotmail.com.
  • Rodolfo Ungerfeld Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República. Uruguay.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v7i2.4173

Palabras clave:

Destete artificial, Temperamento, Esquila preparto, Neurosteroides, Ungulados

Resumen

En roedores, los tratamientos con progesterona (P4) reducen la respuesta de estrés o ansiedad a través de la acción de algunos metabolitos de la P4 (allopregnanolona y pregnanolona). Aunque existen pocos trabajos que hayan estudiado estos efectos en rumiantes, los tratamientos con P4 tienen una gran potencialidad para su aplicación práctica en sistemas productivos. El objetivo de esta revisión fue sintetizar información básica sobre la respuesta de estrés y los principales mecanismos estudiados en roedores, por los que la P4 mitiga la respuesta de estrés. Además, se presenta información primaria sobre los efectos del tratamiento con P4 en el comportamiento reactivo y la respuesta de estrés en rumiantes. Se muestran los efectos del tratamiento con P4 sobre la respuesta de estrés al destete en ovejas, y sobre algunas pruebas de temperamento en terneras. También se presenta información sobre el estrés de la esquila en ovejas gestadas, y por tanto con altas concentraciones séricas de P4. En síntesis, altas concentraciones de P4 reducen la respuesta de estrés, y pueden generar cambios en el comportamiento reactivo de los animales. Sin embargo, para que el tratamiento con P4 o sus concentraciones endógenas sean utilizados como herramienta práctica durante manejos estresantes, o como un factor a ser considerado a la hora de seleccionar animales por temperamento, es necesario realizar más estudios aplicados.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Johnson EO, Kamilaris TC, Chrousos GP, Gold PW. Mechanisms of stress: a dynamic overview of hormonal and behavioral homeostasis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1992;

(16):115-130.

Patchev VK, Shoaib M, Holsboer F, Almeida OFX. The neurosteroid tetrahydroprogesterone counteracts corticotropin-releasing hormone-induced anxiety and alters the release and gene expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone in the rat hypothalamus. Neuroscience 1994;(62):265-271.

Barbaccia ML, Serra M, Purdy RH, Biggio G. Stress and neuroactive steroids. Int Rev Neurobiol 2001;(46):243-272.

Wang M. Neurosteroids and GABA-A receptor function. Front Endocrinol 2011;(2):1-23.

Patchev VK, Hassan AH, Holsboer DF, Almeida OF. The neurosteroid tetrahydroprogesterone attenuates the endocrine response to stress and exerts glucocorticoid-like effects on vasopressin gene transcription in the rat hypothalamus. Neuropsychopharmacol 1996;(5):533-540.

Brunton PJ, McKay AJ, Ochedalski T, Piastowska A, Rebas E, Lachowicz A and Russell JA. Central opioid inhibition of neuroendocrine stress responses in pregnancy in the rat is Induced by the neurosteroid allopregnanolone. J Neurosci 2009;(29):6449-6460.

Bitran D, Shiekh M, McLeod M. Anxiolytic effect of progesterone is mediated by the neurosteroid allopregnanolone at brain GABAA receptors. J Neuroendocrinol 1995;

(3):171-177.

Bitran D, Purdy RH, Kellogg CK. Anxiolytic effect of progesterone is associated with increases in cortical allopregnanolone and GABAA receptor function. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1993;(45):423-428.

Freitas-de-Melo A, Banchero G, Hötzel MJ, Damián JP, Ungerfeld R: Progesterone administration reduces the behavioural and physiological responses of ewes to abrupt weaning of lambs. Animal 2013;(7):1367-1373.

Viérin M, Bouissou MF. Pregnancy is associated with low fear reactions in ewes. Physiol Behav 2001;(72):579-587.

Magri G, Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R. Progesterona y pruebas de evaluación de temperamento: distancia de fuga y velocidad de salida del tubo en terneras. Congreso Uruguayo de Producción Animal, 2013.

Carrasco GA, Van de Kar LD. Neuroendocrine pharmacology of stress. Eur J Pharm 2003;(463):235-272.

Charmandari E, Tsigos C, Chrousos G. Endocrinology of the stress response. Annu Rev Physiol 2005;(67):259-84.

Matteri RL, Carroll JA, Dyer CJ. Neuroendocrine responses to stress. In: Moberg GP, Mench JA. The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Inglaterra: CABI Publishing; 2000;43- 76.

McEwen BS, Wingfield JC. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav 2003;(43):2-15. 16. Earley B, Buckham-Sporer K, Gupta S, Pang W, Ting S. Biologic response of animals to husbandry stress with implications for biomedical models. Anim Physiol 2010;(2):25-42.

Cunningham JC, Bradley KG. Tratado de fisiologia veterinária. 4ta ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Elsevier; 2008.

Sabban EL. Catecholamines and stress. En: Soreq H, Friedman A, Kaufer D. Stress: from molecules to behavior: a comprehensive analysis of the neurobiology of stress responses. 1ª ed. Weinheim, Alemania: Wiley Blackweel; 2010;19-36.

Bush IE, Ferguson KA. The secretion of the adrenal cortex in sheep. J Endocr 1953;(10):1-8.

Kudielka BM, Kirschbaum C. Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: a review. Biol Psychol 2007;(69):113- 132.

Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress response? Integrationing, permissive, suppressive stimulatory and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 2000;(2):55-89.

Griffin JFT. Stress and immunity: a Unifying concept. Vet Immunol Immunop 1989;(20):263-312.

Pacák, K, Palkovits M. Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders. Endocr Rev 2001;(22):502-548.

Maniam J, Morris MJ. The link between stress and feeding behaviour. Neuropharmacology 2012;(63):97-110.

Moberg, GP. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: Moberg GP, Mench JA. The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Reino Unido, 2001;1- 21.

Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R. Destete artificial en ovinos: respuesta de estrés y bienestar animal. [enviado a Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2015].

Giriboni J, Lacuesta L, Damián JP, Ungerfeld, R, 2015. Grouping previously unknown bucks is a stressor with negative effects on reproduction. Trop Anim Health Pro 2015;(47):317-322.

Schumacher M, Coirini H, Robert F, Guennoun R, El-Etr M. Genomic and membrane actions of progesterone: implications for reproductive physiology and behavior. Behav Brain Res 1999;(105):37-52.

McEwen BS. Non-genornic and genomic effects of steroids on neural activity. Tips 1991;(12):141-147.

King SR. Neurosteroids and the nervous system. 1ª ed. New York, USA: Springer; 2012.

Valera S, Ballivet M, Bertrand D. Progesterone modulates a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;(89):9949-9953.

Wu FS, Lai CP, Liu BC. Non-competitive inhibition of 5-HT3 receptor-mediated currents by progesterone in rat nodose ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett 2000;(278):37-40.

Olsen RW, Tobin AJ. Molecular biology of GABA receptors. Faseb J 1990;

(4):1469-1480.

Wu FS, Gibbs TT, Farb DH. Inverse modulation of gaminobutyric acid- and glycine-induced currents by progesterone. Mol Pharmacol 1990;(37):597-602.

Seamark RF, Nancarrow CD, Gardiner J. Progesterone metabolism in ovine blood: the formation of 3α- hydroxypregn-4-en-20-one and other substances. Steroids 1969;(15):589-604.

Corpechot C, Young J, Calvel M, Wehrey C, Veltz JN, Touyer G, et al. Neurosteroids: 3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alphapregnan- 20-one and its precursors in the brain, plasma, and steroidogenic glands of male and female rats. Endocrinology 1993;(133):1003-1009.

Pluchino N, Cubeddu A, Giannini A, Merlini S, Cela V, Angioni S, Genazzani AR. Progestogens and brain: An update. Maturitas 2009;(62):349-355.

Compagnone NA, Mellon SH. Neurosteroids: biosynthesis and function of these novel neuromodulators. Front Neuroendocrinol 2000;(21):1-56.

Paul SM, Purdy RH. Neuroactive steroids. Faseb J 1992;(6):2311-2322.

Jiang P, Yang CX, Wang YT, Xu TL. Mechanisms of modulation of pregnanolone on glycinergic response in cultured spinal dorsal horn neurons of rat. Neuroscience 2006;(141):2041- 2050.

Bullock AE, Clark AL, Grady SR, Robinson SF, Slobe BS, Marks MJ, Collins AC. Neurosteroids modulate nicotinic receptor function in mouse striatal and thalamic synaptosomes. J Neurochem 1997;(68):2412-2423.

Kaura V, Ingram CD, Gartside SE, Young AH, Judge SJ. The progesterone metabolite allopregnanolone potentiates GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition of 5-HT neuronal activity. Eur Neuropsychopharm 2007;(17):108-115.

Sedláèek M, Koøínek M, Petroviè M , Cais O, Adamusová E, Chodounská H, Vyklický L. Jr. Neurosteroid modulation of ionotropic glutamate receptors and excitatory synaptic transmission. Physiol Res 2008;(97):49-57.

Lambert JJ, Cooper MA, Simmons RDJ, Weir CJ, Belelli D. Neurosteroids: endogenous allosteric modulatorsof GABAA receptors. Psychoneuroendocrinol 2009;(34):48-58.

Akk G, Covey DF, Evers AS, Steinbach JH, Zorumski CF, Mennerick S. Mechanisms of neurosteroid interactions with GABAA receptors. Pharmacol Therapeut 2007;(116):35-57.

Reddy DS, O’Malley BW, Rogawski MA. Anxiolytic activity of progesterone in progesterone receptor knockout mice. Neuropharmacology 2005;(48):14-24.

Hassell J, Miryalac CSJ, Hiegeld C, Uphouse L. Mechanisms responsible for progesterone’s protection against lordosisinhibiting effects of restraint I. Role of progesterone receptors. Horm Behav 2011;(60):219-225.

Uphouse L, Adams S, Miryala CSJ, Hassell J, Hiegel C. RU486 blocks effects of allopregnanolone on the response to restraint stress. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2013;(103):568-572.

Uphouse L, Hiegel H. An antiprogestin, CDB4124, blocks progesterone’s attenuation of the negative effects of a mild stress on sexual behavior. Behav Brain Res 2013;(240):21- 25.

Brinton RD, Thompson RF, Foy MR, Baudry M, Wang J, Finch CE, et al. Progesterone receptors: Form and function in brain. Front Neuroendocrin 2008;(29):313-339.

Bixo M, Bäckström T. Regional distribution of progesterone and 5a-pregnane-3,20-dione in rat brain during progesterone-induced “anesthesia”. Psychoneuroendocrinol 1990;(15):159-162.

Fraile IG, Mc Ewen BS, Pfaff DW. Progesterone inhibition of aggressive behaviors in hamsters. Physiol Behav 1986;(39):225-229.

Poindron P, Levy F, Keller M. Maternal responsiveness and maternal selectivity in domestic sheep and goats: the two facets of maternal attachment. Dev Psychobiol 2006;(49):54- 70.

Ewbank E. Nursing and suckling behaviour amongst Clun Forest ewes and lambs. Anim Behav 1967;(15):251-258.

Arnold GW, Wallace SR, Maller RA. Some factors involved in natural weaning processes in sheep. Appl Anim Ethol 1979;(5):43-50.

Orgeur P, Bernard S, Naciri M, Nowak R, Schaal B, Levy F. Psycological consequences of two different weaning methods in sheep. Reprod Nutr Dev 1999;(39):231-244.

Cockram MS, Imlah P, Goddard PJ, Harkiss GD, Waran NK. The behavioural, endocrine and leucocyte response of ewes to repeated removal of lambs before the age of natural weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1993;(38):127-142.

Pérez-León I, Orihuela A, Lidfors L, Aguirre V. Reducing mother young separation distress by inducing ewes into oestrous into day of weaning. Anim Welf 2006;(15):383- 389.

Hearly PJ, Falk RH. Values of some biochemical constituents in the serum of clinically normal sheep. Aust Vet J 1974;(50):302-305.

Allison RW. Laboratory evaluation of plasma and serum proteins. In: Thrall MA. Veterinary hematology and clinical chemistry. 2ª ed. Oxford, Inglaterra: Blackwell Publishing; 2012;460-475.

Corner RA. Exposure of ewes to stressors in mid- and late pregnancy: Postnatal effects on the ewe and lamb. [doctoral thesis]. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University; 2007.

Carcangiu V, Vacca GM, Parmeggiani A, Mura MC, Pazzola M, Dettori ML, Bini PP. The effect of shearing procedures on blood levels of growth hormone, cortisol and other stress haematochemical parameters in Sarda sheep. Animal 2008;(2):606-612.

Aleksiev Y. The effect of shearing on the behaviour of some physiological responses in lactating Pleven Blackhead ewes. Bulg J Agric Sci 2009;(15):446-452.

Yardimci M, Sahin EH, Cetingul IS, Bayram I, Aslan R, Sengor E. Stress responses to comparative handling procedures in sheep. Animal 2013;(7):143-150.

Corner RA, Kenyon PR, Stafford KJ, West DM, Oliver MH. The effect of mid-pregnancy shearing or yarding stress on ewe post-natal behavior and the birth weight and postnatal behavior of their lambs. Liv Sci 2006;(102):121-129.

Sanger ME, Doyle RE, Hinch GN, Lee. Sheep exhibit a positive judgement bias and stress-induced hyperthermia following shearing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;(131):94- 103.

Piccione G, Caola G. Influence of shearing on the circadian rhythm of body temperature in the sheep. J Vet Med A 2003;(50):235-240.

Mousa-Balabel TM, Salama MA. Impact of shearing date on behaviors and performances of pregnant Rahmani ewes. Acad Sci Eng Tech 2010;(41):1196-1200.

Dýrmundsson OR. Shearing time of sheep with special reference to conditions in northern Europe: a review. Icel Agr Sci 1991;(5):39-46.

Al-Ramamneh D, Gerken M, Riek A. Effect of shearing on water turnover and thermobiological variables in German Blackhead mutton sheep. J Anim Sci 2011;(89):4294-4304.

Kenyon PR, Morris ST, Revell DK, McCutcheon SN. Nutrition during mid to late pregnancy does not affect the birth weight response to mid pregnancy shearing. Austr J Agric Res 2002;(53):13-20.

Piccione G, Casella S, Alberghina D, Zumbo A, Pennisi P. Impact of shearing on body weight and serum total proteins in ewes. Spanish J Agric Res 2010;(8):342-346.

Fordyce G, Dodt RM, Wythes JR. Cattle temperaments in extensive herds in northern Queensland. Australian J Exp Agric 1988;(28):683.

Grandin T. Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1993;(36):1-9.

Fordyce G, Goddard M, Tyler R, Williams G, Toleman M. Temperament and bruisind of Bos indicus cross Cattle. Aust J Exp Agr 1985;(25):283-288.

Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M-V, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;(101):185-242,

Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Meneghetti M, Losi TC, Vasconcelos JLM. Effects of temperament on pregnancy rates to fixedtimed AI in Bos indicus beef cows. Livest Sci 2011;(142):108- 113.

Aguilar N, Balbuena O, Kucseva D, Navamuel J. Evaluación del temperamento en bovinos cruza cebú. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste: Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas. 2004. http://www.unne.edu.ar/Web/cyt/ com2004/4-Veterinaria/V-028.pdf. Consultado 18 dic, 2013.

Tozser J, Maros K, Szentlèleki A, Zàndoki R, Nikodèmusz E, Balàzs F, et al. Evaluation of temperament in cows of different age and bulls of different colour variety. Czech J Anim Sci 2003;(48):344-348.

Paranhos Da Costa MJR, Sant’Anna AC, Rueda PM, Baldi F, Albuquerque LG. Correlação genética entre três tipos de indicadores do temperamento de bovinos. Congresso Latino Americano de Etologia Aplicada. Ilhéus, Brasil. 2011:CDROM.

Santanna A, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Rueda P-M, Soares DRS, Wemelsfelder F. A comparison of three cattle temperament assessment methods. [abstract]. Cong Int Soc Appl Ethology. Indianápolis, Estados Unidos. 2011;(45):121.

Burrow HM. Variances and covariances between productive and adaptive traits and temperament in a composite breed of tropical beef cattle. Livest Prod Sci 2001;(70):213-233.

Voisinet BD, Grandin T, Tatum JD, O’Connor SF, Struthers JJ. Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have a higher average daily weight gains the cattle with excitable temperaments. J Anim Sci 1997;(75):892-896.

Menchaca A, Chifflet N. Caracterización de la actividad ovárica al inicio del servicio en rodeos de cría. [resumen]. XXXIII Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría. Uruguay 2005:11.

Ungerfeld R. Exposure to androgenized steers did not improve the fertility obtained in progesterone-based fixedtimed artificial insemination programs in extensively managed cows and heifers. Anim Prod Sci 2010;(50):68-71.

Descargas

Publicado

02.05.2016

Cómo citar

Freitas-de-Melo, A., & Ungerfeld, R. (2016). Progesterona y respuesta de estrés: mecanismos de acción y sus repercusiones en rumiantes domésticos. Revisión. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 7(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v7i2.4173
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    1302
  • PDF
    744

Número

Sección

Revisiones bibliográficas

Métrica

Artículos similares

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.