Sheep production systems in Salinas, San Luis Potosí: characterization and challenges for their sustainability in semi-arid regions of Mexico

Autores/as

  • Amanda Severa Ortiz-Dávila Colegio de Postgraduados | Campus San Luis Potosí | Posgrado de Innovación en Manejo de Recursos Naturales | Maestría en Ciencias | Iturbide 73, Salinas de Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, México. image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3813-3729
  • Ismael Hernández-Ríos Colegio de Postgraduados | Campus San Luis Potosí | Posgrado de Innovación en Manejo de Recursos Naturales | Maestría en Ciencias | Iturbide 73, Salinas de Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, México. image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4284-7416
  • Gerardo Loera-Alvarado Colegio de Postgraduados | Campus San Luis Potosí | Posgrado de Innovación en Manejo de Recursos Naturales | Maestría en Ciencias | Iturbide 73, Salinas de Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, México. image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-3819
  • Héctor Gutiérrez-Bañuelos Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" | Unidad Académica de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia | General Enrique Estrada, Zacatecas, México. image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v17i2.7005

Palabras clave:

Sheep production, Traditional systems, Drought, Climate resilience, Rural producers

Resumen

This study characterized sheep production systems in Salinas, San Luis Potosí, Mexico, based on structured surveys applied to 40 producers sampled through non-probabilistic snowballing. Sociodemographic, productive, sanitary, environmental, and marketing aspects were recorded, as well as their relationship with producers´ perception of drought impact. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, associations between categorical variables were evaluated with chi-square tests, and monotonic associations involving ordinal variables were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. Producer typologies were identified using Gower distance and k-medoids clustering (PAM), with the number of clusters selected by silhouette width. Results showed predominance of mixed grazing–partial confinement management (75 %), rustic pens (97.5 %), limited supplementation and preventive health practices (15 % reported regular vaccination). Drought was perceived as “very severe” by 77.5 % of producers, and reported losses averaged 6.9 animals per production unit (maximum 40). Correlation analyses indicated weak, non-significant associations between drought perception, losses and producer age. Clustering identified two producer profiles largely differentiated by management: mixed systems (n= 30), with larger flocks and higher reported losses, and intensive systems (n= 10), with smaller flocks and lower reported losses. These findings support the need for differentiated interventions focused on low-cost feeding and health management, drought preparedness and market strengthening for semi-arid sheep systems.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Espinosa GJA. Productividad del sistema-producto pecuario en México. Téc Pecu Méx 2001;39(2):127-138. https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/1329.

INEGI. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de San Luis Potosí 2022. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía; 2022. https://www.inegi.org.mx. Consultado Mar 19, 2025.

Tarango-Arámbula LA. Problemática y alternativas de desarrollo de las zonas áridas y semiáridas de México. Rev Chap Ser Zonas Áridas 2005;4(2):17-21. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=455545052003.

Figueroa-Sandoval B, Figueroa-Rodríguez KA, Daniel TM, Carrillo-Hidalgo OM, Hernández-Rosas F, eds. Proyecto integral ovino para el municipio de Salinas, S.L.P.: Un análisis con enfoque en los productores. 1a ed. México: Colegio de Postgraduados; 2010.

Lira R. Caracterización del sistema de producción ovina austral. En: Strauch O, Lira R, editors. Bases para la producción ovina en Magallanes. Chile: Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias; 2012:39-47. https://biblioteca.inia.cl/bitstreams/2b08b0cc-df1e-49ba-9295-87e588133b74/download. Consultado Mar 20, 2025.

Andrade GL. Micro-negocios asociativos campesinos: Análisis económico de un sistema de producción ovina, Región del Maule, Chile. Gestión Producción 2005;12:165-175. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2005000200003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2005000200003

Zaldivar-Gómez A, Martínez-López B, Suzán G, Rico-Chávez O. Multivariate classification of livestock production systems in Mexico. Trop Anim Health Product 2025;57(3):140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04389-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04389-5

INEGI. Compendio de información geográfica municipal 2010: Salinas, San Luis Potosí. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía; 2010. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/areasgeograficas/. Consultado Mar 22, 2025.

García E. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen: para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana. 2a ed. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geografía; 1973.

INEGI. Censo Agropecuario 2022. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía; 2023. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ca/2022/. Consultado 14 Ene, 2026.

Vázquez-Martínez I, Jaramillo-Villanueva JL, Bustamante-González Á, Vargas-López S, Calderón-Sánchez F, Torres-Hernández G, Pittroff W. Estructura y tipología de las unidades de producción ovinas en el centro de México. Agri Soc Des 2018;15(1):85-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v15i1.750

SIAP. SIACON: Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria de Consulta. México: Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural; 2020. https://www.gob.mx/siap/documentos/siacon-ng-161430. Consultado Ene 12, 2026.

Pateiro M, Munekata PE, Domínguez R, Lorenzo JM. Ganadería extensiva frente al cambio climático en España. Inf Tec Econ Agrar 2020;116(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2020.024

Schütte J. Typology of German sheep farms: Differences in structure, characteristics, challenges and the provision of goods and services. Small Ruminant Res 2023;226:107022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107022

Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Díaz CAL, Ruiz-Romero RA, Chay-Canul AJ, Lee-Rangel HA, Gonzalez-Ronquillo M, et al. A brief update on sheep production in México: challenges and prospects. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 2023;26(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4872

FAO. Conducting small-scale surveys in livestock-dependent communities: Guidelines for survey design and statistical analysis. (FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 19). Roma, Italia: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2016.

Ou-Salah L, Van Praag L, Verschraegen G. Feminisation of agriculture and the role of environmental changes: “It's already a tough job and it's getting tougher due to weather changes.” Geographical J 2024;190:e12542. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12542

Puech T, Stark F. Diversification of an integrated crop-livestock system: Agroecological and food production assessment at farm scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2023;344:108300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108300

Hernández-Valenzuela D, Sánchez-Vera E, Gómez-Demetrio W, Martínez-García CG. Productive and socioeconomic characterization of a sheep production system in a natural protected area in Mexico. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2019;10(4):951-965. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i4.4470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i4.4470

Godde CM, Mason-D’Croz D, Mayberry DE, Thornton PK, Herrero M. Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain: a review of the evidence. Glob Food Security 2021;28:100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488

Luna-Coronel ME, Gutiérrez-Bañuelos H, García-Cervantes D, Espinoza-Canales A, Muñoz-Salas C, Gutiérrez-Piña FJ. Drought-resilience in Mexican Drylands: Integrative C4 Grasses and Forage Shrubs. Grasses 2026;5(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses5010002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses5010002

López-Ridaura S, Masera O, Astier M. Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems: the MESMIS framework. Ecol Indic 2002;2(1-2):135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00043-2

Adnan N, Rehman HM, Alam MN. Exploring agricultural innovation: an empirical investigation of factors influencing the adoption and non-adoption of smart fertilizer technology among farmers in developing countries. Agric Food Secur 2025;14:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-025-00529-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-025-00529-0

Luna-Coronel ME, Cortés-Vega CM, Dorado-González GE, García-Cervantes D, Muñóz-Sálas LC, Gutiérrez-Bañuelos H. Sustainability assessment of mixed farming systems among farmer field school participants in Zacatecas, Mexico. Agro Product 2025;18(11):293-303. https://doi.org/10.32854/79gh1y36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32854/79gh1y36

Publicado

08.05.2026

Cómo citar

Ortiz-Dávila, A. S., Hernández-Ríos, I., Loera-Alvarado, G., & Gutiérrez-Bañuelos, H. (2026). Sheep production systems in Salinas, San Luis Potosí: characterization and challenges for their sustainability in semi-arid regions of Mexico. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 17(2), e1727005. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v17i2.7005
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    531
  • PDF
    161
  • PDF
    56
  • XML
    36
  • XML
    20
  • Texto completo
    63
  • Full text
    41

Número

Sección

Artículos

Métrica

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a