Effect of planting position on the morphology and productivity of forage cactus cv. Mexican Elephant Ear (Opuntia stricta Haw.) in the São Francisco Valley

Autores/as

  • Bárbara Dantas de Oliveira Dias Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Elisvaldo José Silva Alencar Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco
  • Francisco Israel Lopes Sousa Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Airton Alves Vieira Correia Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Joao Paulo Nascimento Izidoro de Brito Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Salete Alves de Morais Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Semiárido). Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Leydimára Medrado Oliveira Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Ricardo Macedo da Silva Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of the Sertão Pernambucano, Petrolina Campus, Rural Zone, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Laiane Devesa Araújo Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Jessyka Natalya Ferreira Barbosa Federal University of the São Francisco Valley (UNIVASF). Agricultural Sciences Campus, Pernambuco, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v17i1.6939

Palabras clave:

Cladode morphology, Forage cactus, Opuntia stricta, Planting arrangement, Forage alternative

Resumen

This study evaluated the effects of topological arrangement on the morphological and productive characteristics of the forage cactus Mexican Elephant Ear (Opuntia stricta Haw.) under semi-arid conditions. A completely randomized block design with four treatments and four replications compared the Deck and Domino systems, with planting densities ranging from 25,000 to 57,500 plants ha⁻¹. Over 180 d, morphological parameters (number of cladodes, dimensions, and plant height) and productive variables (dry matter and forage mass) were monitored. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P≤0.05) in SAS® OnDemand for Academics. The Deck arrangement significantly increased the number of cladodes (23 %) and their length (15 %) compared to the Domino system (P<0.05), which was attributed to improved light interception. Plant height and the number of primary cladodes followed a quadratic increasing trend, while cladode perimeter and area index decreased after 120 d. However, no significant differences were observed in dry matter yield (8.2 t ha⁻¹) or total forage mass (34.5 t ha⁻¹) among treatments (P>0.05). These results demonstrate that planting arrangement significantly influences cactus morphology but not short-term productivity. The Deck system favored better architectural development, suggesting possible long-term advantages for forage production in environments with limited water availability. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing cactus cultivation in semi-arid regions.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Brasil. Superintendência do Desenvolvimento do Nordeste (Sudene) 2024.

Reis Filho RJCD, Carneiro MSDS, Pereira ES, Furtado RN, Morais Neto LBD, Magalhães, JA, Lopes MN. Biomass components and water use efficiency in cactus pear under different irrigation systems and harvest frequencies. Rev Bras Zootec 2022;51:e20210093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210093

Instituto Brasileiro De Geografia E Estatística (IBGE). Censo Agropecuário do Brasil. Brasília – DF: IBGE 2017.

Da Silva GIN, Jardim AMDRF, Alves HKMN, Souza SM, de Souza CAA, Júnior GDNA, Silva TGF. Cultivation of forage plants of regional appeal to the Brazilian Semiarid from the perspective of agrometeorological techniques to improve resilience: a review. Res Soc Dev 2020;9(10):e1449108291-e1449108291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8291

Souza MDS, Silva FTG, De Souza LSB, Alves HKMN, Leite RMC, De Souza C. AA, Souza PJDOP. Growth, phenology and harvesting time of cactus-millet intercropping system under biotic mulching. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2022;68(6)764-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1852553

Araújo Júnior GDN, Silva TGFD, Souza LSBD, Souza MDS, Araújo GGLD, Moura MSBD, Alves HKMN. Productivity, bromatological composition and economic benefits of using irrigation in the forage cactus under regulated deficit irrigation in a semiarid environment. Bragantia 2021;80:e1221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20200390

Jardim AMDRF, Silva TGF, de Souza, LSB, Júnior GDNA, Alves HKMN, de Sá Souza M, Moura MSB. Intercropping forage cactus and sorghum in a semi-arid environment improves biological efficiency and competitive ability through interspecific complementarity. J Arid Environ 2021;188:104464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104464

Da Silva TG, Jardim AM, Diniz WJDS, Souza LS, Júnior GDN, Silva GÍ, Morais JE. Profitability of using irrigation in forage cactus-sorghum intercropping for farmers in semi-arid environment. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 2023;27(2):132-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n2p132-139

De Lemos M, Ferreira-Neto M, Fernandes SC, de Lima YB, Dias NDS, Medeiros JF, Sá SFV. The effect of domestic sewage effluent and planting density on growth and yield of prickly pear cactus in the semiarid region of Brazil. J Arid Environ 2021;185:104372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104372

Alves CP, Jardim AMDRF, Júnior GDNA, de Souza LS, de Araújo GGL, de Souza CAA, Silva TGF. How to enhance the agronomic performance of cactus-sorghum intercropped system: planting configurations, density and orientation. Ind Crop Prod 2022;184:115059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115059

Gomes GMF, Lopes MN, Silva RG, Beserra LT, Cândido MJD. Effect of spacing, soil, and planting direction on the vegetative growth of' Gigante'cactus pear. In: X Int Congress on Cactus Pear and Cochineal: Cactus-the new green revolution in drylands. 2022;155-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1343.22

Lopes L, Cardoso D, Camargo K, Silva T, Souza J, Silva JR, Araújo TP. Palma forrageira na alimentação de ruminantes. Pubvet 2019;13:170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31533/pubvet.v13n3a277.1-10

Ferreira CM, Cunha MVda, Ferreira dos Santos MV, Mello ACLde, dos Santos DC, Silva MdaC, Coelho JJ. Effect of plant spacing and cutting intensity on the morphology and productivity of forage cactus [Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw.]. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci, 2024;41(1):67–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2023.2183524

Voltolini T, de Miranda JEC, dos Santos RD, Muniz E, Fernandes E, Magalhaes VMA. Plantio e manejo da palma forrageira no Semiárido: cartilhas elaboradas conforme a metodología. e-Rural. 2016.

Silva LMD, Fagundes JL, Viegas PAA, Muniz EN, Rangel JHDA, Moreira AL, Backes AA. Produtividade da palma forrageira cultivada em diferentes densidades de plantio. Cienc Rural 2014;44:2064-2071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20131305

Rocha RS, Voltolini TV, Gava CAT. Características produtivas e estruturais de genótipos de palma forrageira irrigada em diferentes intervalos de corte. Arch Zootec 2017;66(255):365-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v66i255.2512

Silva PF, Matos RM, Borges VE, Melo JAP, Dantas NJ. Características morfológicas de três cultivares de palma forrageira sob fertilização mineral em campina grande–PB. Rev Encicl Biosfera 2015;11(21):385-397.

Araújo CDA, Araújo GGLD, Silva TGFD, Voltolini TV, Lima DO, Gois GC, Campos FS. Morphological and productive responses of Cactus pear cv. Mexican elephant ear under different planting densities. N Z J Agric Res 2025;1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2025.2473712

Gomes MDLS, de Queiroz MJ, Pereira FC, da Costa DB, de Oliveira GS Caracterização biométrica de artículos da palma miúda (Nopalea cochenillifera) em função da adubação orgânica. Rev Principia 2016;29:39-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18265/1517-03062015v1n29p39-45

Albuquerque ALSD, Silva WRT, Soares FMF, Soares CF, Carneiro MDC, Maior Júnior RJDS. Desenvolvimento vegetativo de palma forrageira (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dick) no Sertão de Alagoas. In: Inovações na nutrição animal: desafios da produção de qualidade. ECD 2021:58-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37885/210202970

Petinari RA, Soratto RP, Souza-Schlick GDD, Zanotto MD, Bergamasco SMPP. Custos de produção e lucratividade de cultivares de mamona em diferentes arranjos de plantas. Pesq Agropec Trop 2012;42:143-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632012000200004

Da Silva TGF, Primo JTA, Morais JEF, Silva Diniz WJ, Souza CAA, Silva, CM. Crescimento e produtividade de clones de palma forrageira no semiárido e relações com variáveis meteorológicas. RC 2015;28:10-18.

Nunes JDSL, Salvador SKR, Jardim AMDRF, Júnior GDNA, Carvalho AA, Souza LSB, Silva TGF. Índices morfofisiológicos e biofísicos da palma forrageira cultivada sob tecnologias hídricas na bacia do Rio Pajeú. J Env Anal Progr 2020;5(1):128-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24221/jeap.5.1.2020.2825.128-139

Silva TGF, Primo JTA, Silva SMS, Moura MSBD, Santos DCD, Silva MDC, Araújo, JEM. Indicadores de eficiência do uso da água e de nutrientes de clones de palma forrageira em condições de sequeiro no Semiárido brasileiro. Bragantia 2014;73: 184-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2014.017

Cavalcante LAD, Santos AGR, da Silva LM, Fagundes JL, da Silva MA. Respostas de genótipos de palma forrageira a diferentes densidades de cultivo. Pesqui Agropecu Trop 2014;44:424-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632014000400010

Publicado

06.03.2026

Cómo citar

Dias, B. D. de O., Alencar, E. J. S., Sousa, F. I. L., Correia, A. A. V., de Brito, J. P. N. I., de Morais, S. A., … Barbosa, J. N. F. (2026). Effect of planting position on the morphology and productivity of forage cactus cv. Mexican Elephant Ear (Opuntia stricta Haw.) in the São Francisco Valley. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 17(1), e1716939. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v17i1.6939
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    179
  • PDF
    67
  • PDF
    59
  • Texto completo
    20
  • Full text
    22

Número

Sección

Notas de investigación

Métrica