Función ovárica y respuesta a la sincronización del estro en ganado Criollo en México. Revisión
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i2.6032Palabras clave:
Bovinos carne, Recursos zoogenéticos, Inseminación artificial, OvulaciónResumen
Hoy en día, las biotecnologías reproductivas han hecho posible conservar y aprovechar los recursos zoogenéticos. Una de estas tecnologías son los programas de sincronización de estros, mismos que permiten programar la época para el empadre acorde a la disponibilidad de forraje o el nacimiento de los becerros por fines comerciales. Otra aplicación es la reducción del intervalo parto primera ovulación, mediante protocolos que facilitan el uso de inseminación artificial. Los bovinos criollos son un recurso genético valioso, debido a su rusticidad y adaptabilidad a condiciones ambientales difíciles; son resistentes a parásitos, aprovechan los recursos forrajeros disponibles y se reproducen en sistemas con poca o nula suplementación. En México, los primeros estudios de sincronización de bovinos criollos sugieren que las vacas criollas no responden adecuadamente a los protocolos hormonales y se obtienen porcentajes de gestación inferiores a los obtenidos en otras razas. Lo anterior, dio origen a una serie de investigaciones en fisiología reproductiva y uso de biotecnologías en ganado criollo. El objetivo de esta revisión es recabar la información existente sobre el uso de protocolos de sincronización de estros y ovulación en bovinos criollos de México; con la finalidad de poder identificar las líneas de investigación necesarias para el desarrollo de protocolos de sincronización de estros y ovulación adecuados para el ganado criollo.
Descargas
Citas
O’Neill CJ, Swain DL, Kadarmideen HN. Evolutionary process of Bos taurus cattle in favourable versus unfavourable environments and its implications for genetic selection. Evol Appl 2010;(5-6): 422–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00151.x.
McManus C, Prescott E, Paludo GR, Bianchini E, Louvandini H, Mariante AS. Heat tolerance in naturalized Brazilian cattle breeds. Livest Sci 2009;120(3):256–264. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.014.
Espinoza V, Ortega PR, Palacios EA, Guillén TA. Tolerancia al calor y humedad atmosférica de diferentes grupos raciales de ganado bovino. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2011;16(1):2009-2011.
Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Muchenje V. Monthly changes in body condition scores and internal parasite prevalence in Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on sweetveld. Trop Anim Health Prod 2009;41:1169–1177. doi:10.1007/s11250-008-9297-0.
Delgado JV, Martínez MA, Acosta A, Álvarez LA, Armstrong E, Camacho E, et al. Genetic characterization of Latin-America creole cattle using microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 2011;43(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02207.x.
FAO. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture, J. Bélanger, D. Pilling editors. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome. 2019.
Callejas-Juarez N, Aranda-Gutiérrez H, Martínez-Nevárez J, Juárez-Beltrán L. Comercialización del ganado criollo para rodeo en el Estado de Chihuahua. Rev Mex Agroneg 2011; Vol. Esp:72–81.
Segura-Correa JC, Montes-Pérez RC. Razones y estrategias para la conservación de los recursos genéticos animales. Rev Biomed 2001;12:196–206.
López-Rojas R, Celis-Parra G, Tovar-Claros G, García-Gasca A, García-Bustos J. Ovarian follicular dynamics in caqueteño creole cattle breed at the colombian amazon piedmont. Am J Anim Vet Sci 2019;14(2):101–10. doi: 10.3844/ajavsp.2019.101.110.
Shahid B, Khan MI, Andrabi SMH, Razzaq A, Khan MN. Estrus duration and expression in natural and induced estrus in indigenous (Bos indicus) cattle. J Anim Plant Sci 2019;29(3):645–649.
Diskin MG, Kenny DA. Managing the reproductive performance of beef cows. Theriogenology 2016;86 (1):379–87. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.052.
Zárate-Martínez JP, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Rodríguez-Almeida FA. Comportamiento reproductivo de vacas criollas con amamantamiento restringido y sincronización del estro. Agro Meso 2010;21(1):121–130.
Quezada-Casasola A, Beltrán-Prieto L, Macías-Cruz U, Avendaño-Reyes L, Ramírez-Godínez J. Comparison of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and oestradiol cypionate administered 24 h after CIDR removal during an oestrus synchronization protocol for artificial insemination in Mexican Criollo cattle. Vet Arhiv 2016;86(3):437–51. doi.org/10.1071/AN12334.
Lamb GC, Dahlen CR, Larson JE, Marquezini G, Stevenson JS. Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: a review. J Anim Sci 2010;(18):181–92. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2349.
Bó GA, Huguenine E, Javier J, de la Mata JJ, Núñez-Olivera R, Baruselli PS, et al. Programs for fixed-time artificial insemination in South American beef cattle. Anim Reprod 2018;15(Suppl.1):952–962. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0025.
Bó GA, de la Mata JJ, Baruselli PS, Menchaca A. Alternative programs for synchronizing and resynchronizing ovulation in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2016;86(1):388–96. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.053.
Bridges GA, Mussard ML, Helser LA, Day ML. Comparison of follicular dynamics and hormone concentrations between the 7-day and 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR program in primiparous beef cows. Theriogenology 2014;81(4):632–638. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.11.020.
Vasconcelos JLM, Carvalho R, Peres RFG, Rodrigues ADP, Junior IC, Meneghetti M, et al. Reproductive programs for beef cattle: Incorporating management and reproductive techniques for better fertility. Anim Reprod 2017;14(3):547–57. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR998.
Smith MF, Pohler KG, Perry GA, Patterson D. Physiological factors that affect pregnancy rate to artificial insemination in beef cattle. Proc Applied Reprod Strat Beef Cattle. 2013:27–45.
Martínez MF, Kastelic JP, Bó GA, Caccia M, Mapletoft RJ. Effects of oestradiol and some of its esters on gonadotrophin release and ovarian follicular dynamics in CIDR-treated beef cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;86(1–2):37–52. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.06.005.
Bó GA, Baruselli PS, Mapletoft RJ. Synchronization techniques to increase the utilization of artificial insemination in beef and dairy cattle. Anim Reprod 2013;10(3):137–142.
Colazo MG, Mapletoft RJ. A review of current timed-AI (TAI) programs for beef and dairy cattle. Can Vet J 2014;(55):772-780.
Colazo MG, Kastelic JP, Mapletoft RJ. Effects of estradiol cypionate (ECP) on ovarian follicular dynamics, synchrony of ovulation, and fertility in CIDR-based, fixed-time AI programs in beef heifers. Theriogenology 2003;60(5):855–865. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00091-8.
Nuñez-Olivera R, de Castro T, García-Pintos C, Bó G, Piaggio J, Menchaca A. Ovulatory response and luteal function after eCG administration at the end of a progesterone and estradiol’ based treatment in postpartum anestrous beef cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2014;146:111–116. doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.02.017.
Baruselli PS, Reis EL, Marques MO, Nasser LF, Bó GA. The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in tropical climates. Anim Reprod Sci 2004;(82–83):479–486. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.025.
Marquezini GHL, Mercadante VRG, Olson KC, Jaeger JR, Perry GA, Lamb GC. Effects of equine chorionic gonadotropin on follicle development and pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows with or without calf removal. J Anim Sci 2013;91:1216–1224. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5382.
Martinez MF, Tutt D, Quirke LD, Tattersfield G, Juengel JL. Development of a GnRH-PGF2α-progesterone-based synchronization protocol with eCG for inducing single and double ovulations in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2014;92(11):4935–4948. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7512.
Baruselli PS, Sá Filho MF, Ferreira RM, Sales JNS, Gimenes LU, Vieira LM, et al. Manipulation of follicle development to ensure optimal oocyte quality and conception rates in cattle. Reprod Dom Anim. 2012;47(Suppl 4):134–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02067.x.
Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC, Stevenson JS, Ottobre JS, Garverick, HA, Anderson LL. Pregnancy rates per artificial insemination for cows and heifers inseminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:295-300. doi: 10.3168 / jds.S0022-0302 (97) 75937-X.
Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH. Theriogenology 1995;44(7): 915-923. doi: 10.1016 / 0093-691x (95) 00279-h.
Geary TW, Whittier JC. Effects of a timed insemination following synchronization of ovulation using the Ovsynch or CO- Synch protocol in beef cows. Prof Anim Sci 1998;14:217−220.
Geary TW, Whittier JC, Downing ER, LeFever DG, Silcox RW, Holland MD, et al. Pregnancy rates of postpartum beef cows that were synchronized using Syncro-Mate-B or the Ovsynch protocol. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1523−1527. doi: 10.2527 / 1998.7661523x.
Geary TW, Whittier JC, Hallford DM, MacNeil MD. Calf removal improves conception rates to the Ovsynch and CO-Synch protocols. J Anim Sci 2001;79:1–4. doi: 10.2527/2001.7911
Lamb GC, Stevenson JS, Kesler DJ, Garverick HA, Brown DR, Salfen BE. Inclusion of an intravaginal progesterone insert plus GnRH and prostaglandin F2α for ovulation control in postpartum suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci 2001;79(9):2253–2259. doi: 10.2527 / 2001.7992253x.
Martínez MF, Kastelic JP, Adams GP, Cook B, Olson WO, Mapletoft RJ. The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2002;57(3):1049–1059. doi: 10.1016 / s0093-691x (01) 00682-3.
Moreira F, Orlandi C, Risco CA, Mattos R, Lopes F, Thatcher WW. Effects of presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001;84(7):1646–1659. doi: 10.3168 / jds.S0022-0302 (01) 74600-0.
Small JA, Colazo MG, Kastelic JP, Erickson NE, Mapletoft RJ. Effects of presynchronization and eCG on pregnancy rates to GnRH-based, fixed-time artificial insemination in beef heifers. Can J Anim Sci 2010;90(1):23–34. doi.org/10.4141/CJAS09058.
Fernandez-Novo A, Pérez-Garnelo SS, Villagrá A, Pérez-Villalobos N, Astiz S. The effect of stress on reproduction and reproductive technologies in beef cattle—A review. Animals. 2020;10(11):1–23. doi: 10.3390 / ani10112096.
Bridges GA, Helser LA, Grum DE, Mussard ML, Gasser CL, Day ML. Decreasing the interval between GnRH and PGF2alpha from 7 to 5 days and lengthening proestrus increases timed-AI pregnancy rates in beef cows. Theriogenology 2008;69:843–851. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2007.12.011.
Geary TW, Smith MF, Macneil MD, Day ML, Bridges GA, Perry GA, et al. Triennial Reproduction Symp: Influence of follicular characteristics at ovulation on early embryonic survival. J Anim Sci 2013;91:3014–3021. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5887.
de la Mata JJ, Bo GA. Sincronización de celos y ovulación utilizando protocolos con benzoato de estradiol y GnRH en períodos reducidos de inserción de un dispositivo con progesterona en vaquillonas para carne. Taurus 2012;55:17–23.
de la Mata JJ, Ré M, Bo GA. Combination of oestrus detection and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef heifers following a shortened oestradiol-based protocol that provides for a lengthened proestrus. Reprod Fertil Dev 2014;27:96–97. 10.1071 / RDv27n1Ab8.
de La Mata JJ, Núñez-Olivera R, Cuadro F, Bosolasco D, de Brun V, Meikle A, et al. Effects of extending the length of pro-oestrus in an oestradiol- and progesterone-based oestrus synchronisation program on ovarian function, uterine environment and pregnancy establishment in beef heifers. Reprod Fertil Dev 2018;30(11):1541–52. doi: 10.1071 / RD17473.
Peralta-Torre JA, Aké-López JR, Centurión-Castro FG, Magaña-Monforte JG. Comparación del cipionato de estradiol vs benzoato de estradiol sobre la respuesta a estro y tasa de gestación en protocolos de sincronización con CIDR en novillas y vacas Bos indicus. Universidad y Ciencia 2010;26(2):163–169.
Melo LF, Monteiro PLJ, Surjus RS, Drum JN, Wiltbank MC, Sartori R. Progesterone-based fixed-time artificial insemination protocols for dairy cows: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone versus estradiol benzoate at initiation and estradiol cypionate versus estradiol benzoate at the end. J Dairy Sci 2016;99(11):9227–9237. doi: 10.3168 / jds.2016-11220.
Herrera-Alvarez R, Pugliesi G, Nogueira-Natal FL, Constantino-Rocha C, Ataide-Júnior GA, Ferreira-Melo AJ, et al. Reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows treated with different doses of equine chorionic gonadotropin at the end of a progesterone-estrogen based protocol for fixed-time artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2018;118:150–6. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2018.06.003
Menchaca A, Nuñez-Olivera R, Cuadro F, Bo G. Pregnancy rates in beef heifers synchronized with a shortened oestradiol-based treatment that provides for a prolonged proestrus. Reprod Fertil Dev 2014;27(1):96–96. doi.org/10.1071/RDv27n1Ab7.
Sales JNS, Bottino MP, Silva LACL, Girotto RW, Massoneto JPM, Souza JC, et al. Effects of eCG are more pronounced in primiparous than multiparous Bos indicus cows submitted to a timed artificial insemination protocol. Theriogenology 2016;86(9):2290–2295. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2016.07.023.
Yáñez-Avalos DO, López-Parra JC, Moyano-Tapia JC, Quinteros-Pozo RO, Marini PR. Inseminación artificial a tiempo fijo en vacas con proestro prolongado. Agron Mesoam 2018;29(2):363–73. dx.doi.org/10.15517/ma.v29i2.29503.
Sales JNS, Carvalho JBP, Crepaldi GA, Cipriano RS, Jacomini JO, Maio JRG, et al. Effects of two estradiol esters (benzoate and cypionate) on the induction of synchronized ovulations in Bos indicus cows submitted to a timed artificial insemination protocol. Theriogenology 2012;78(3):510–516. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2012.02.031.
Bastos-Souza AL, Saporski-Segui M, Ernandes-Kozicki L, Romulado-Weiss R, Abreu A, Formighieri-Bertol MA, et al. Impact of equine chorionic gonadotropin associated with temporary weaning, estradiol benzoate, or estradiol cypionate on timed artificial insemination in primiparous Bos indicus cows. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2016;59:1–7. doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2016150389.
Sá Filho MF, Crespilho AM, Santos JEP, Perry GA, Baruselli PS. Ovarian follicle diameter at timed insemination and estrous response influence likelihood of ovulation and pregnancy after estrous synchronization with progesterone or progestin-based protocols in suckled Bos indicus cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;120:23–30. doi: 10.1016 / j.anireprosci.2010.03.007.
Mion B, Bonotto RM, Farias CO, Rosa FS, Pradiee J, Rovani MT, et al. J-Synch protocol associated with estrus detection in beef heifers and non-lactating cows. Review. Medicina Veterinária 2019;13(2): 269-274. doi.org/10.26605/medvet-v13n2-3089.
Brusveen DJ, Cunha AP, Silva CD, Cunha PM, Sterry RA, Silva EPB, et al. Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008;91(3):1044–1052. doi: 10.3168 / jds.2007-0409.
Navanukraw C, Redmer DA, Reynolds LP, Kirsch JD, Grazul-Bilska AT, Fricke PM. A modified presynchronization protocol improves fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004;87(5):1551–1557. doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73307-X.
Rodríguez-Martínez R, Neri ICC, Meza-Herrera CA, Alvarado-Espino AS, Cruz JLM, González-Álvarez VH, et al. Reproductive efficiency of Ovsynch + CIDR in Holstein cows under a fixed time artificial insemination scheme in northern Mexico. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2018;9(3):506–517. doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v9i3.4300.
Flores-Domínguez S, Muñoz-Flores LR, López-Ordaz R, Flores-Aréchiga CF, Mapes G, Hernández-Cerón J. Pregnancy in dairy cows with two protocols for synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2015;6(4):393–404.
Echternkamp SE, Thallman RM. Factors affecting pregnancy rate to estrous synchronization and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(10):3060–8. doi: 10.2527 / jas.2010-3549.
Ahmadzadeh A, Gunn D, Hall JB, Glaze JB. Evaluation of treatment with a 5-day versus 7-day controlled internal drug-release insert on reproductive outcomes of beef heifers using a modified timed-artificial insemination protocol. Prof Anim Sci 2015; 31(3):270–277. doi.org/ 10.15232/pas.2014-01378.
Whittier WD, Currin JF, Schramm H, Holland S, Kasimanickam RK. Fertility in Angus cross beef cows following 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR or 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR estrus synchronization and timed artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2013;80(9):963–9. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2013.07.019.
Hill SL, Perry GA, Mercadante VRG, Lamb GC, Jaeger JR, Olson KC, et al. Altered progesterone concentrations by hormonal manipulations before a fixed-time artificial insemination CO-Synch + CIDR program in suckled beef cows. Theriogenology 2014;82(1):104–13. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2014.03.008.
Kasimanickam RK, Firth P, Schuenemann GM, Whitlock BK, Gay JM, Moore DA, et al. Effect of the first GnRH and two doses of PGF2α in a 5-day progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on heifer pregnancy. Theriogenology 2014;81(6):797–804. doi: 10.1016 / j.theriogenology.2013.12.023.
Gunn PJ, Culp KC, Lemenager RP, Bridges GA. Efficacy of the 5-day CO-Synch ovulation synchronization protocol with or without the inclusion of exogenous progesterone in beef cows. Prof Anim Sci 2016; 32(1):82–89. doi: 10.15232/pas.2015-01423.
Bridges GA, Ahola JK, Brauner C, Cruppe LH, Currin JC, Day ML, et al. Determination of the appropriate delivery of prostaglandin F2α in the five-day CO-Synch + controlled intravaginal drug release protocol in suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci 2012;90:4814–22. doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4880.
Corpron MR, Menegatti-Zoca S, Reynolds M, Carnahan K, Hall JB, Ahmadzadeh A. Evaluating the effects of a high-concentration dose of prostaglandin F2α in a 5-d CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release protocol on fertility in beef cows. Transl Anim Sci 2019;3(Supl 1):1754–1757. doi: 10.1093 / tas / txz081.
Lima FS, Ribeiro ES, Bisinotto RS, Greco LF, Martinez N, Amstalden M, et al. Hormonal manipulations in the 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol to optimize estrous cycle synchrony and fertility in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2013;96(11):7054–65. doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7093.
Macmillan K, Gobikrushanth M, Sanz A, Bignell D, Boender G, Macrae L, et al. Comparison of the effects of two shortened timed-AI protocols on pregnancy per AI in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2020;142:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.09.038
García-Martínez B. Los primeros pasos del ganado en México. Relaciones. Estudios de Historia y Sociedad. 1994;59:11-44.
Ulloa-Arvizu R, Gayosso-Vázquez, Ramos-Kuri M, Estrada MJ, Montaño M, Alonso RA. Genetic analysis of Mexican Criollo cattle populations. J Anim Breed Genet 2008;125:351-359.
Russell ND, Rios J, Erosa G, Remmenga MD, Hawkins DE. Genetic differentiation among geographically isolated populations of Criollo cattle and their divergence from other Bos taurus breeds. J Anim Sci 2000;78(9):2314–22. doi: 10.2527/2000.7892314x
DAD-IS. 2021. Base de datos sobre la diversidad de los animales domésticos. FAO. Roma, Italia. [http://dad.fao.org/]. Consultado 16 Nov, 2021.
Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, Guevara Franco JA, Palacios-Espinosa A. Caracterización morfométrica y faneróptica del bovino criollo Chinampo de México. Arch Zoot 2009;58(222):277-279.
Espinoza JV, López RA, Ortega RP, Palacios AE, Guillén AT, Hernández HC. Hábitos de amamantamiento del ganado bovino Chinampo (Bos taurus) de México. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2011;16(3):2686–2691. doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.269.
Villaseñor-González F, de La Torre-Sánchez JF, Martínez-Velázquez G, Álvarez-Gallardo H, Pérez-Reynozo S, Palacios- Fránquéz JA, et al. Caracterización de la respuesta ovárica a la superovulación en bovino Criollo Coreño utilizando dosis reducidas de FSH. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2017;8(3):225–32. doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i3.4498.
Moreno-Flores LA, Macías-Coronel H, Martínez-Velázquez G, Guerrero-Bustamante JJ. Aspectos reproductivos del bovino Criollo Coreño y sus cruzas en el trópico. Abanico Vet 2012;2(1):32–40.
Méndez Palacios N, Rosas García M, Serrano Palapa J, Avila Benítez R, Méndez Mendoza M. Caracterización morfométrica del bovino Criollo Mixteco. Caracterización morfométrica del bovino criollo mixteco. Arch Zootec 2002;51:217–221.
Hernández-Beltrán A, Cervantes-Acosta P, Gómez-Boucrin F, Domínguez-Mancera B, Barrientos-Morales M. Los Bovinos Criollos en el Golfo de México. In: Perezgrovas-Grovas. RA, de la Torre-Sánchez F, editors. Los bovinos criollos de México, historia caracterización y perspectivas. 1st ed. Chiapas, México: Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas; 2015:209–235.
Perezgrovas R, Vázquez D, Rodríguez G, Galdámez D. Aproximación fenotípica a la diversidad de los bovinos criollos en la región central montañosa de Chiapas, México. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservación Animal 2011;1:384–387.
López-Caraveo E. Caracterización etnológica de vacas criollas en el estado de Campeche [Tesis maestría]. Tecnológico Nacional de México Instituto, Tecnológico de Conkal. 2019.
Parra-Cortés RI, Magaña-Magaña MA. Vacas, toros y bueyes criollos en peligro. Ecofronteras 2020;24(68):26–29.
Quezada-Casasola A, Avendaño-Reyes L, Macías-Cruz U, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Rivas-Cáceres RR. Estrous behavior, ovulatory follicle dynamics, and corpus luteum size in creole cows after spontaneous or prostaglandin F2α-induced estrous. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2015;28(4):303–12. doi: 10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n4a02.
Quezada-Casasola A, Avendaño-Reyes L, Ramírez-Godínez JA, MacÍas-Cruz U, Correa-Calderón A. Behavioural, follicular and hormonal characteristics of the oestrous cycle of Mexican Criollo cattle. Anim Prod Sci 2013;54(3):277–284. dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN12334.
Quezada-Casasola A, Avendaño-Reyes L, Macías-Cruz U, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Correa-Calderón A. Estrus behavior, ovarian dynamics, and progesterone secretion in Criollo cattle during estrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014;46(4):675–84. doi:10.1007/s11250-014-0562-0.
Ginther OJ, Knopf L, Kastelic JP. Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. J Reprod Fert 1989;87:223–230. doi: 10.1530 / jrf.0.0870223.
Figueiredo RA, Barros CM, Pinheiro’ OL, Soler JMP. Ovarian folicular dynamics in Nelore breed (Bos indicus) cattle. Theriogenology 1997;47:1489–1505. doi: 10.1016 / s0093-691x (97) 00156-8.
Alfaro-Astorima MI, Ormachea-Sánchez HH, Alvarado-Malca AE. Ovarian follicular dynamics of a creole cattle under grazing conditions in high Andean areas of Peru. Sci Agropecu 2020;11(4):621–628. doi: 10.17268 / sci.agropecu.2020.04.18.
Carvalho JBP, Carvalho NAT, Reis EL, Nichi M, Souza AH, Baruselli PS. Effect of early luteolysis in progesterone-based timed AI protocols in Bos indicus, Bos indicus × Bos taurus, and Bos taurus heifers. Theriogenology (2008);69:167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.035.
Sánchez-Arciniega C, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Domínguez-Díaz D, Corral-Flores G, Grado-Ahuir JA, Flores-Mariñelarena A, et al. Respuesta de vacas Criollas de Rodeo a la suplementación con selenio y propionato de calcio, y a la sincronización de la ovulación. Tecnociencia 2013;7(3):132–138.
Pérez-Hernández P, Becerril-Pérez M, Lamothe-Zavaletta C, Torres-Hernández G, López-Ortiz S, Gallegos-Sánchez J. Efecto del amamantamiento retrasado en la actividad posparto de las vacas y en los becerros de doble propósito. Interciencia 2006;31(10):748-752.
Montiel F, Ahuja C. Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of postpartum anestrus in cattle: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;85:1-26. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.001.
Pérez-Hernández P, García-Winder M, Gallegos-Sánchez J. Postpartum anoestrus is reduced by increasing the within-day milking to suckling interval in dual purpose cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2002;73:159–168. doi: 10.1016 / s0378-4320 (02) 00147-1.
Ruiz-Barrera O, Anchondo-Garay A, Flores-Mariñelarena A, Ríos-Ramírez G, Rodríguez-Almeida F, Castillo-Castillo Y. Destete precoz en ganado criollo mexicano de rodeo. Tecnociencia Chihuahua 2009;3(1):27–32.
Moreno-Flores LA, Macías-Coronel H, Martínez-Velázquez G, Guerrero-Bustamante JJ. Aspectos reproductivos del bovino Criollo Coreño y sus cruzas en el trópico. Abanico Vet 2012;2(1):32–40.
Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, López-Amador R, Palacios-Espinosa A, Ortega-Pérez R, Ávila-Serrano N, Murillo-Amador B. Efecto del toro sobre el comportamiento estral de vacas Chinampas (Bos taurus) en una región tropical seca. Zootecnia Trop 2007;25(1):19–28.
Rosendo-Ponce A, Rosales-Martínez F, Cruz-Reyes L, Canseco-Sedano R, Gallegos-Sánchez J, Becerril-Pérez CM. Sincronización de estro en vaquillas criollas Lechero Tropical puras y mestizas. Zootecnia Trop 2017;35:35–44.
Ayala LE, Pesantez JL, Rodas ER, Dután JB, Calle JR, Murillo YA, et al. Dinámica folicular de vaquillas Criollas al pastoreo en el altiplano ecuatoriano. Arch Zootec 2019;68(262):184–90. doi.org/10.21071/az.v68i262.4135.
Chasombat J, Nagai T, Parnpai R, Vongpralub T. Ovarian follicular dynamics and hormones throughout the estrous cycle in Thai native (Bos indicus) heifers. Anim Sci J 2013;85(1):15–24. doi:10.1111 / asj.12086.
Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Cappellozza BI, Mueller CJ, Delcurto T. Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. J Anim Sci 2012;90(10):3547–55. doi: 10.2527 / jas.2011-4768.
Cooke RF, Moriel P, Cappellozza BI, Miranda VFB, Batista LFD, Colombo EA, et al. Effects of temperament on growth, plasma cortisol concentrations and puberty attainment in Nelore beef heifers. Animal 2019;13(6):1208–1213. doi:10.1017/S1751731118002628.
Kasimanickam R, Asay M, Schroeder S, Kasimanickam V, Gay JM, Kastelic JP, et al. Calm temperament improves reproductive performance of beef cows. Reprod Dom Anim 2014;49(6):1063–1067. doi: 10.1111 / rda.12436.
Solano J, Galindo F, Orihuela A, Galina CS. The effect of social rank on the physiological response during repeated stressful handling in Zebu cattle (Bos indicus). Physiol Behav 2004;82(4):679–83. doi: 10.1016 / j.physbeh.2004.06.005.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
-
Resumen1610
-
PDF1643
-
PDF 271
-
Texto completo1051
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores/as que publiquen en la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores/as, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial, el cual será cedido a la revista para su difusión en acceso abierto.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
