1. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrílas y Pecuarias
  2. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias

Encabezado de página

9, 10, 11 y 12 de noviembre de 2022.

Villahermosa, Tabasco

reunionescientificas.inifap.gob.mx

 

 

Usuario/a

FACTOR DE IMPACTO

 

2020 = 1.048

ÍNDICE SCIMAGO

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

 

SÍGUENOS

 

 Tweets by revistapecuaria

Palabras clave Apis mellifera Bovinos Calidad Composición química Digestibilidad ELISA Energía Enfermedades Escherichia coli Heredabilidad Leche Materia seca México Ovinos Ovinos de pelo PCR Prevalencia Resistencia Vampirinip III cambio climático Ácidos grasos
Idioma
  • Inicio
  • Acerca de
  • Iniciar sesión
  • Registrarse
  • Buscar
  • Actual
  • Archivos
  • Notas al Autor
  • Ayuda
Inicio > Vol. 13, Núm. 1 (2022) > Bevenuto da Silva

Performance of lambs fed total feed silage based on cactus pear

Juscelino Kubitschek Bevenuto da Silva, Gherman Garcia Leal de Araújo, Edson Mauro Santos, Juliana Silva Silvade Oliveira, Fleming Sena Campos, Glayciane Costa Gois, Tiago Santos Silva, Alex Gomes da Silva Matias, Ossival Lolato Ribeiro, Alexandre Fernandes Perazzo, Anderson de Moura Zanine

Resumen


This study aimed was to evaluate the intake, apparent digestibility, water balance, nitrogen balance, and productive performance in lamb fed cactus pear silage associated with tropical forages. Forty male intact crossbred lambs, with an initial body weight of 18.85 ± 1.2 kg, were used in the experiment. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 5 treatments and 8 replications. The treatments consisted of diets with different proportions of buffelgrass and wheat bran as sources of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), in total feed silage (TFS) based on cactus pear: TFS1 - 279 g/kg of buffelgrass; TFS2 - 240 g/kg of buffelgrass and 17 g/kg of wheat bran; TFS3 - 198 g/kg of buffelgrass and 34 g/kg of wheat bran; TFS4 - 108 g/kg of buffelgrass and 74 g/kg of wheat bran; TFS5 – 118 g/kg of wheat bran. The lowest NDF intake was found in lambs that consumed TFS5 (402 g/d). The non-fibrous carbohydrates apparent digestibility was higher for TFS5, while the NDF apparent digestibility of TFS5 and TFS4 was higher than TFS1. Diets promoted an average daily weight gain of 180.8 g/d. Under experimental conditions, the use of forage cactus pear and concentrate in the form of total mixed rations silage leads to greater intake of crude protein, non-fibrous carbohydrates, ether extract and greater digestibility of non-fibrous carbohydrates and neutral detergent fiber, however, all diets were viable in the feed of confined sheep, providing gains of up to 198 g/d according with the formulation of the diet.


Palabras clave


Intake; Food conservation; Water balance; Weight gain

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF Texto (English)

Referencias


Paula TA, Véras ASC, Guido SI, Chagas JCC, Conceição MG, Gomes RN, et al. Concentrate levels associated with a new genotype of cactus (Opuntia stricta [Haw]. Haw.) cladodes in the diet of lactating dairy cows in a semi-arid region. J Agric Sci 2019;156(10):1251-1258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185961900011X 2019 v.1.

Oliveira JPF, Ferreira MAF, Alves AMSV, Melo ACC, Andrade IB, Urbano SA, et al. Carcass characteristics of lambs fed spineless cactus as a replacement for sugarcane. Asian-Austral J Anim Sci 2018;31(4):529-536. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0375.

Pereira GA, Santos EM, Oliveira JS, Araújo GGL, Paulino RS, Perazzo AF, et al. Intake, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, and microbial protein synthesis in sheep fed spineless-cactus silage and fresh spineless cactus. Small Ruminant Res 2021;194(e106293):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106293.

Miranda-Romero LA, Vazquez-Mendoza P, Burgueño-Ferreira JA, Aranda-Osorio G. Nutritive value of cactus pear silages for finishing lambs. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev 2018;20(1):196-215. http://www.jpacd.org/jpacd/article/view/37.

Moura MSC, Guim A, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Cardoso DB, Lima Júnior DM, et al. The inclusion of spineless cactus in the diet of lambs increases fattening of the carcass. Meat Sci 2020;160(e107975):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107975.

Silva TS, Araújo GGL, Santos EM, Oliveira JS, Campos FS, Godoi PFA, et al. Water intake and ingestive behavior of sheep fed diets based on silages of cactus pear and tropical forages. Trop Anim Health Prod 2021;53(e224):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02686-3.

Matias AGS, Araújo GGL, Campos FS, Moraes SA, Gois GC, Silva TS, et al. Fermentation profile and nutritional quality of silages composed of cactus pear and maniçoba for goat feeding. J Agric Sci 2020;158(4):304–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000581.

Carvalho GGP, Rebouças RA, Campos FS, Santos EM, Araújo GGL, Gois GC, et al. Intake, digestibility, performance, and feeding behavior of lambs fed diets containing silages of different tropical forage species. Anim Feed Sci Techn 2017;228(1):140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.04.006.

Silva KB, Oliveira JS, Santos EM, Cartaxo FQ, Guerra RR, Souza AFN, et al. Ruminal and histological characteristics and nitrogen balance in lamb fed diets containing cactus as the only roughage. Trop Anim Health Prod 2020;52(2):637-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02051-5.

NRC. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: Sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Research Council. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC; 2007.

Silva JFC, Leão MI. Fundamentos de nutrição de ruminantes. Livroceres: Piracicaba;1979.

Church DC. Digestive physiology and nutrition of ruminants: Digestive physiology. 2nd ed. O & B Books Publishing, Corvallis;1976.

Aoac - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Ed., Latimer Jr., G.W. 20th ed. Washington, DC; 2016.

Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2000;285(6):1217-1240. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12477183/.

Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. Editora UFV, Viçosa; 2002.

Sniffen CJ, O’Connor JD, Van Soest PJ. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J Anim Sci 1992;70(11):3562–3577. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1459919.

Hall MB. Challenges with non-fiber carbohydrate methods. J Anim Sci 2003;81(12):3226–3232. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123226x.

Weiss WP. Energy prediction equations for ruminant feeds. In: Cornell Nutrition Conference Feed Manufactures, 61, Ithaca. Proc Ithaca: Cornell University, 1993:176-185.

NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Research Council. 7th ed. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2001.

McGrath J, Duval SM, Tamassia LFM, Kindermann M, Stemmler RT, Gouvea VN, et al. Nutritional strategies in ruminants: A lifetime approach. Res Vet Sci 2018;116(1):28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.09.011.

Raffrenato E, Fievisohn R, Cotanch KW, Grant RJ, Chase LE, Van Amburgh ME. Effect of lignin linkages with other plant cell wall components on in vitro and in vivo neutral detergent fiber digestibility and rate of digestion of grass forages. J Dairy Sci 2017;100(10):8119-8131. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12364.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5849

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2022

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.