Milk yield derived from the energy and protein of grazing cows receiving supplements under an agrosilvopastoral system

Autores/as

  • Sherezada Esparza-Jiménez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México.
  • Benito Albarran Portillo Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9807-8452
  • Manuel González-Ronquillo Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Estado de México, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3616-4157
  • Anastacio García-Martínez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8021-5412
  • José Fernando Vázquez-Armijo Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-969X
  • Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales (ICAR). Estado de México, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-0847

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i1.5529

Palabras clave:

Agrosilvopastoral, Milk from forage, Supplements, Nitrogen excretions

Resumen

Dual purpose farms southwest of the State of Mexico produce milk and calves under subtropical agrosilvopastoral systems (ASPS). During the dry season, farmers supplement their cattle due to the low availability and quality of grasses, without considering, besides grasses, the contribution of woody species to dry matter intake, metabolizable energy (ME), and crude protein (CP) requirements of cows. The aim of this study was to determine milk produced from forage energy (MFe) and protein (MFp) of grazing cow with three types of supplement. First supplement consisted of cracked maize and commercial concentrate resulting on 14 % of CP (S14).  To the S14 mixture 7 % of soybean meal was added to increase CP to 16 % (S16), and commercial concentrate of 16 % CP was used as a third supplement (SC16). Six lactating cows were allocated in a 3x3 replicated Latin Square (three cows per square), three experimental periods (EP) (three weeks per EP). There were no significant effects of supplements (P=0.80) on performance variables. Mean milk yield was 6.8 kg/cow/d. Milk from forage energy and protein were 0.8 and 6.1 kg/cow/day, respectively. Mean milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was high regardless of supplement; but nitrogen in urine (44.1 mg/dL) and feces (1.4 mg/g) were higher for SC16 (P=0.001 and 0.04, respectively). Cows obtained 90 and 10 % of their CP and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance and production from the agrosilvopastoral system.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Sherezada Esparza-Jiménez, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México.

Ingeniero Agónomo Zootecnista. 2008.

M. en C. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec, 2011.

Benito Albarran Portillo, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México.

Médico Veterinario FMVZ-UAEMex 1999.

M. en C. FMVZ-UNAM 2003.

Ph.D. Imperial Collge, University of London 2007.

Anastacio García-Martínez, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México.

Médico Veterinario FMVZ-UAEMex 1999.

M. en C. FMVZ-UNAM 2003.

Dr. Universidad de Zaragoza. España. 2008.

José Fernando Vázquez-Armijo, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec. Km 67.5 Carretera Toluca-Tejupilco, Temascaltepec. 51300. Estado de México, México.

Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas: Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, MX2003-01 to 2004-12 | Maestro en Ciencias Producción Animal Tropical (Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria Agronomía y Ciencias)Education.Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México: Temascaltepec, México, MX2007-09 to 2010-08 | Doctor en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales (Centro Universitario UAEM Temascaltepec)Education

Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales (ICAR). Estado de México, México.

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Coyoacan, Distrito Federal, MX1973-05-16 to 1977-10-10 | Médico Veterinario Zootecnista (Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia)EducationUniversity of Reading: Reading, Berkshire, GB1980-10-03 to 1981-07-04 | Master of Science (Department of Agriculture)University of London: London, London, GB1981-10-03 to 1985-07-10 | Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) (Wye College

Citas

IndexMundi. Agricultural production, supply and distribution. www.indexmundi.com/agriculture/. Accessed July 15, 2019.

Lactodata Información sobre el sector lechero. Reporte 11 www.lactodata.info/produccion-de-leche-de-vaca. 2017. Consultado julio 2, 2018.

Albarrán-Portillo B, Rebollar-Rebollar S, García-Martínez A, Rojo-Rubio R, Avilés-Nova F, Arriaga-Jordán CM. Socioeconomic and productive characterization of dual purpose farms oriented to milk production in a subtropical region of Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015;47:519-523.

Absalón-Medina VA, Blake RW, Gene Fox D, Juárez-Lagunes EG, Nicholson FC, Canudas-Lara EG. Limitations and potentials of dual-purpose cow’s herds in central coastal Veracruz, Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011;44:1131-1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0049-1.

Salas-Reyes IG, Arriaga-Jordán CM, Estrada-Flores JG, García-Martínez A, Rojo-Rubio R, Vázquez-Armijo JF, et al. Productive and economic response to partial replacement of cracked maize ears with ground maize or molasses in supplements for dual-purpose cows. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2019;10(2):335-352. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i2.4569.

Deen AU, Tyagi N, Yadav RD, Kumar S, Tyagi AK, Kumar Singh, S. Feeding balanced rations can improve the productivity and economics of milk production in dairy cattle: a comprehensive field study. Trop Anim Health Prod 2019;51:737-744 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1747-8.

Charbonneau E, Chouinard PY, Allard G, Lapierre H, Pellerin D. Milk from forage as affected by carbohydrates source and degradability with alfalfa silage-based diets. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:283-293.

Charbonneau E, Bregard A, Allard G, Lefebvre D, Pellerin D. Revisiting the prediction of milk from forage according to NRC 2001 [abstract]. Can J Anim Sci 2003; 83:647.

Albarrán-Portillo B, García-Martínez A, Ortiz-Rodea A, Rojo-Rubio R, Vázquez-Armijo JF, Arriaga-Jordán CM. Socioeconomic and productive characteristics of dual purpose farms based on agrosilvopastoral systems in subtropical highlands of central Mexico. Agroforest Syst 2018;93:1939-1947. doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0299-2.

Grazing terminology. Terminology for grazing lands grazing animals. Forage information system. Oregon State University. Accessed April 2nd 2020. https://forages.oregonstate.edu/fi/topics/pasturesandgrazing/grazingsystemdesign/grazingterminology.

Broderick GA, and Clayton MK. A statistical evaluation of animal and nutritional factors influencing concentrations of milk urea nitrogen. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:2964–2971. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76262-3.

Wildman EE, Jones GM, Wagner PE. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to select production characteristics. J Dairy Sci 1982;265:495-501.

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC International, Arlington, VA, USA. 2000.

Mauricio MR, Mould FL, Dhanoa MS, Owen E, Channa K, Theodorou MK. A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1999;79(4):321-330.

Baker RD. Estimating herbage intake from animal performance. In: Leaver JD editor. Herbage Intake Handbook. Hurley: British Grassland Society. UK. 1982:77-93.

AFRC. Agricultural and Food Research Council. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Wallingford: CAB International. 1993.

Harper JK, Cornelisse S, Kime LF, Hyde J. Budgeting for agricultural decision making. Pennsylvania State University. College of Agricultural Sciences. 2013. https://extension.psu.edu/budgeting-for-agricultural-decision-making. Accessed November 19, 2018.

SAS. SAS/STAT User’s guide. (Version 9 ed.). Cary, NC, USA. 1989.

Kononoff PJ, Handford KJ. Technical Note: Estimating statistical power of mixed models used in dairy nutrition experiments. Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science. Paper 725. 2006 http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscifacpub/725.

Salas-Reyes IG, Arriaga-Jordán CM, Rebollar-Rebollar S, García-Martínez A, Albarrán-Portillo B. Assessment of the sustainability of dual-purpose farms by the IDEA method in the subtropical area of central Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015;47:1187-1194.

Gehman AM, Bertrand JA, Jenkins TC, Pinkerton BW. The effect of carbohydrate source on nitrogen capture in dairy cows on pasture. J Dairy Sci 2006;89(7):2659-2667.

Granzin BC, Dryden G McL. Monensin supplementation of lactating cows fed tropical grasses and cane molasses or grain. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;120:1-16.

Bottini-Luzardo MB, Aguilar-Pérez CF, Centurión-Castro FG, Solorio-Sánchez FJ, Ku-Vera JC. Milk yield and blood urea nitrogen in crossbred cows grazing Leucaena leucocephala in a silvopastoral system in the Mexican tropics. Trop Grasslands-Forrajes Trop 2016; 4:159–167. doi:10.17138/TGFT(4)159-167.

Salvador-Loreto I, Arriaga-Jordán CM, Estrada-Flores JG, Vicente-Mainar F, García-Martínez A, Albarrán-Portillo B. Molasses supplementation for dual-purpose cows during the dry season in subtropical Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016;48(3):643-648. doi:10.1007/s11250-016-1012-y.

Morales CH, Montes AH, Villegas De Gante AZ, Mandujano EA. El proceso socio-técnico de producción de Queso Añejo de Zacazonapan, Estado de México. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2011;2:161–176.

Kohn RA, Kalscheur KF, Russek-Cohen E. Evaluation of models to estimate urinary nitrogen and expected milk urea nitrogen. J Dairy Sci 2002;85:227-233.

Tamminga S. Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution of pollution control. J Dairy Sci 1992;75:345-357.

Jonker JS, Kohn RA, High J. Use of milk urea nitrogen to improve dairy cow diets. J Dairy Sci 2002;85:939-946.

Rivera JL, Chára J, Barahona R. CH4, CO2, and N2O emissions from grasslands and bovine excreta in two intensive tropical dairy production system. Agroforest Syst 2019;93:915-928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0187-9.

Vandermeulen S, Ramírez-Restrepo CA, Beckers Y, Claessens H, Bindelle,J. Agroforestry for ruminants: a review of trees and shrubs as fodder in silvopastoral temperate and tropical production systems. Anim Prod Sci 2018;58:767-777. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16434.

Publicado

15.06.2021

Cómo citar

Esparza-Jiménez, S., Albarran Portillo, B., González-Ronquillo, M., García-Martínez, A., Vázquez-Armijo, J. F., & Arriaga-Jordán, C. M. (2021). Milk yield derived from the energy and protein of grazing cows receiving supplements under an agrosilvopastoral system. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 12(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i1.5529
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    1096
  • PDF
    434
  • PDF
    321
  • Full text
    49

Número

Sección

Artículos

Métrica

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a