https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v16s4.6709
¿Technical note
Effects of Bryophyllum daigremontiana in the broiler diet on productive performance and liver enzymes and serum troponin T in broilers
Samuel López-Aguirre a
Juan Manuel Pinos Rodríguez a*
Patricia Devezé-Murillo a
Alejandro Taylor Estrada-Coates a
Cesar Augusto Rosales-Nieto b
Claudia Jazmín Torres-Martínez c
a Universidad Veracruzana. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Miguel Ángel de Quevedo S/N, esq. Yáñez, Col. Unidad Veracruzana 91710. Veracruz, México.
b Texas State University. Department of Agricultural Sciences. USA.
c Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, San Luis Potosí, México.
*Corresponding author: jpinos@uv.mx
Abstract:
The experiment was conducted to determine the effect of adding Bryophyllum daigremontiana to the feed of broiler chickens on their productive performance and their blood concentration of liver enzymes and troponin T. For this purpose, 120 1-d-old Cobb chicks were randomly assigned to two treatments: a control group and the addition of 20 g of B. daigremontiana per ton of feed. The experiment lasted 49 d, and the body weight, feed intake, and feed conversion were recorded. At the end, blood samples were obtained, and the concentrations of troponin T, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase were determined. The data were analyzed in a mixed model of random and fixed components. Chicks fed with B. daigremontiana had higher (P<0.05) daily weight gain and final weight, better feed conversion, and lower (P<0.05) liver enzyme and troponin T concentrations, compared to the control. The authors conclude that B. daigremontiana improves the productive performance and liver indicators in broilers.
Keywords: Cardioprotector, Production assay, Enzymes.
Received: 30/05/2024
Accepted: 11/03/2025
Growth promoters are chemical substances added to feed to improve broiler growth, increase feed efficiency, productivity, and increase financial indicators. The most commonly used are antibiotics, whose use is controversial and has even been banned in European Union countries as a measure to prevent resistance of various pathogenic bacteria, which may endanger human and animal health(1,2). This has led to the exploration of natural alternatives to replace them —such as the use of leaves, stems, roots or whole specimens of plants with medicinal properties, their essential oils in liquid form(3) or in micro particles(4); their dried leaves, transformed into flours(5); their organic acids(6), or their polar and non-polar extracts(7,8,9)— that have shown antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects(10,11,12), among others, and can improve production rates(13,14). Among its active principles are bufadienolides, the compounds with the highest proportion (17 to 41 mg/100 g dry weight of the leaf) associated with the therapeutic effects of the plant(15) with cardiotonic effect; its leaves and flowers contain flavonoids, phenolic acids, anthocyanins, alkaloids, saponins, and tannins, as well as steroids(16,17,18). Its antioxidant effect may be comparable to the effect of ascorbic acid(18). The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of the inclusion of B. daigremontiana as a dietary additive on the productive performance and blood concentration of liver enzymes and troponin T in broiler chickens.
Whole plants of B. daigremontiana were collected at the Desert Research Institute (Instituto de Investigación de Zonas Desérticas) of Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Mexico. A certified taxonomist from the Institute identified one reference specimen. The plants were cleaned and dried in a Felisa 40L FE-291D forced air oven (Fabricantes Feligneo, S. A. de C.V. Mexico) at 75 °C to constant weight, dried and ground to 2 mm particle size (Thomas Wiley Mill, Thomas Scientific LLC, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). The dried and ground material was stored in an amber glass container at the medium’s temperature (22 °C) until further use.
The research protocol and the procedures with the chickens were reviewed and supervised by a bioethics committee per the Mexican Official Standards for Technical Specifications for the production, maintenance, and use of laboratory animals. 120 1-d-old male Cobb chicks, average weight 50 ± 5 g, vaccinated against Marek's disease, were housed in battery cages (Petersime Inc., Gettysburg, OH) with a capacity of 10 chicks per cage, in a house with a constant temperature (30 °C) and continuous light regulated by electronic timer. The chicks were randomly divided into two treatments: control (n= 60) and with B. daigremontiana (n= 60). Each treatment had six cages with 10 chicks each. Chicks in the starter stage (1 to 7 d of age) were offered a commercial starter powder concentrate with 23 % crude protein, while chicks aged 8 to 49 d were fed a commercial concentrate for fattening with 20 % crude protein (Table 1).
Table 1: Nutritional composition (% DM) of the commercial feed offered to broilers
Nutrient |
Starter feed |
Feed for fattening |
Protein, % |
23 |
20 |
Energy, Mcal/kg |
3.2 |
3.2 |
Ether extract, % |
3 |
3 |
Crude fiber, % |
3 |
3 |
Nitrogen-free extract |
51 |
51 |
Ashes |
3 |
3 |
DM= dry matter, Mcal= mega calories, kg= kilogram.
The dried and ground plant was added at a proportion of 20 g/t feed. Chickens had free access to the concentrate and fresh water during the experimental stage. Every week until day 49, the live weight and feed consumption were recorded, and the feed conversion (FC) was calculated according to North and Bell(19), using the following formula: FC=meal intake/total weight gain.
On d 49, a blood sample was collected from each chick’s brachial/ulnar vein and placed in heparinized tubes to determine the content of troponin T and liver enzymes. Subsequently, the chicks were slaughtered per the official standard applicable in Mexico(20). To quantify the alanine aminotransferase (ALT, EC 2.6.1.2), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, EC 2.6.1.1), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP, EC 3.1.3.1), a Mindray BA-88A semi-automated chemistry analyzer was used, following the process described by Burtis and Bruns(21). Troponin T was quantified with an AQT90 FLEX immunoassay analyzer (Radiometer Medical ApS, Denmark) according to the indications proposed by Collinson et al(22).
For the statistical analysis, data were analyzed as a completely randomized design with 2 treatments and 6 replicates (cage with 10 chicks) each. For this purpose, a mixed model of the MIXED procedure of SAS(23) —which considers a random component (cage) and a fixed component (treatment)— was used. Means between treatments were regarded as different at P<0.05.
No differences in initial weight and feed consumption were observed between treatments, although the chickens fed with B. daigremontiana had a higher final weight and daily weight gain (P<0.05) and better feed conversion values than the chickens that did not receive the plant. Blood concentrations of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and troponin T were lower (P<0.05) in chickens that received B. daigremontiana compared to the control (Table 2). No macroscopic damage to the organs was found at the time of slaughter.
Table 2: Effect of Bryophyllum daigremontiana addition on the productive performance and serum concentrations of liver enzymes and troponin T in broiler chickens.
|
Control |
Treatment |
SEM |
P Value |
Productive performance: |
|
|
|
|
Initial weight, g |
51.3 |
49.8 |
0.1 |
0.10 |
Final weight, g |
2038.9 |
2472.6* |
2.4 |
0.03 |
Average daily weight gain, g |
40.5 |
49.8* |
0.3 |
0.02 |
Feed consumption, g |
5479.4 |
5237.9 |
3.1 |
0.12 |
Feed conversion |
2.7* |
2.1 |
0.1 |
0.04 |
Serum concentrations: |
|
|
|
|
Aspartate aminotransferase, IU L-1 |
352.6 * |
210.8 |
12.4 |
0.03 |
Alanine aminotransferase, IU L-1 |
5.2* |
4.1 |
0.19 |
0.05 |
Alkaline phosphatase, IU L-1 |
84.9* |
63.9 |
1.3 |
0.04 |
Troponin T, µg/ml |
0.61* |
0.47 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
IU L-1= international units per liter, µg/ml = micrograms per milliliter, SEM= standard error of the mean;
* significant difference (P<0.05).
These positive results on the productive performance, liver enzymes, and troponin T seem to be due to the synergistic effect of the biocompounds present in plants of the genus Bryophyllum, which have several pharmacological properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, hepatic, and cardioprotective activity(24). Antioxidants contained in B. daigremontiana, like phenols, flavonoids, catalase, and quercetin(24,25,26), neutralize free radicals such as superoxide anions, nitric oxide, and peroxynitrites, inhibit enzymes such as xanthine oxidase, lipoxygenase and NADPH oxidase, preventing cell death, and may increase the production of endogenous antioxidants(27), which would explain the decrease in the concentration of liver enzymes and troponin T. Although no research on the use of B. daigremontiana in broilers was found in the literature, there is previous evidence reporting toxicity in 2-wk-old chickens when they consumed between 0.8 and 1.2 % of their live weight of K. daigremontiana leaves(28). However, the inclusion of 5 % of a phytopreparation of B. daigremontiana in diets of laying hens did not modify the productive parameters, egg quality, serum concentration of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase(26). The differences between the results of the experiments could be due to the physiological stage of the birds and the percentage of inclusion in the diet, suggesting that bufadienolides in high amounts can cause toxicity especially in young animals(29). In rats with induced liver damage, the juice of leaves of this plant reduced the damage to hepatocytes, as well as the serum concentration of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase(30).
The addition of B. daigremontiana to reduce troponin B concentrations is a very encouraging strategy for cardioprotection, given that this protein is a first-choice biomarker of cardiac damage(31). In practice, this can positively impact the fattening of fast-growing broilers, among which there is a high incidence of cardiac dysfunctions due to increased body mass and blood requirement and reduced cardiac capacity(32).
In conclusion, the addition of B. daigremontiana could be a viable natural option as a non-antibiotic growth promoter, as it improves the productive performance, which is indicative of a better health status of the animal. However, a better understanding of the biocompounds contained in this plant, as well as their biochemical and physiological effects on animals, is still required.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Literature cited:
1. European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2016. EFSA J 2018;16(2). http://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5598.
2. Osman K, Kappell A, Elhadidy M, Elmougy F, El-Ghany W, Orabi A, Yousef H. Poultry hatcheries as potential reservoirs for antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli: a risk to public health and food safety. Sci Rep 2018;8(1):5859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23962-7.
3. Arab Toso F, Mestorino N, Ardonio S. Aceites esenciales como alternativa a los antibióticos promotores de crecimiento en pollos de engorde. Inv Joven 2022;10(3):444-445.
4. Ojeda S, Bautista G, Acero M, Martínez J, Matiz G, Pachón E, Baena Y. Estudio de un sistema microparticulado que contiene aceite de tomillo (Thymus vulgaris) y de su aplicación potencial como promotor de crecimiento en la producción de pollos de engorde. Rev Colomb Cienc Quím Farm 2022;51(1) 387-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rcciquifa.v51n1.102721.
5. Tenías J, Alfaro M, Rivas M, Cárdenas L, Silva R. Productive characteristics in broilers using oregano flour as a growth promoter. Rev Espamc Agro 2021;12(2):107-115. https://doi.org/10.51260/revista_espamciencia.v12i2.283.
6. González A, Ponce L, Alcivar J, Valverde Y, Ortega G. Food supplementation with growth promoters in Cobb 500 broilers. J Selva Andina Anim Sci 2020;7(1):3-16. http://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsaas.2020.070100003.
7. Windisch W, Schedle K, Plitzner C, Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J Anim Sci 2008;86(14):140–148. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0459.
8. Avello M, Cisternas I. Fitoterapia, sus orígenes, características y situación en Chile. Rev Med Chile 2010;138:1288-1293. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872010001100014.
9. Gong J, Yin F, Hou Y, Yin Y. Review: Chinese herbs as alternatives to antibiotics in feed for swine and poultry production: Potential and challenges in application. Can J Anim Sci 2014;94(2):223–241. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS2013-144.
10. Franz C, Baser K, Windisch K. Essential oils and aromatic plants in animal feeding – a European perspective. A review. Flavor Frag J 2010;25(5):327–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1967.
11. Tajkarimi M, Ibrahim S, Cliver D. Antimicrobial herb and spice compounds in food. Food Control 2010;21(19):1199-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.02.003.
12. Mohammadi- Gheisar M, Kim I. Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition – a review. It J Anim Sci 2017;17(1):92–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1350120
13. Garces H, Sinha N. The “Mother of Thousands” (Kalanchoe daigremontiana): A plant model for asexual reproduction and CAM studies. Cold Spring Harb Prot 2009;(10):pdb.emo133. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.emo133.
14. Zhong T, Zhu C, Zeng H, Han L. Analysis of gene expression in Kalanchoe daigremontiana leaves during plantlet formation under drought stress. Electron J Biotechnol 2013;16(6). https://doi.org/10.2225/vol16-issue6-fulltext-14.
15. Kolodziejczyk-Czepas J, Nowak P, Wachowicz B, Piechocka J, Głowacki R, Moniuszko-Szajwaj B, Stochmal A. Antioxidant efficacy of Kalanchoe daigremontiana bufadienolide-rich fraction in blood plasma in vitro. Pharm Biol 2016;54(12):3182–3188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2016.1214740.
16. El- Abdellaoui S, Destandau E, Toribio A, Elfakir C, Lafosse M, Renimel I, Landemarre L. Bioactive molecules in Kalanchoe pinnata leaves: extraction, purification, and identification. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010;398:1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4047-3.
17. Chowdhury A, Biswas S, Das J, Karmakar U, Chandra S, Dutta N. Investigation of cytotoxicity and antifungal activities of petroleum ether and aqueous extracts of leaves and stems of Kalanchoe pinnata (Crassulaceae). Asian J Plant Sci 2011;10:274-277. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2011.274.277.
18. Puertas M, Tobón J, Arango V. Kalanchoe daigremontiana Raym.-Hamet. & H. y su potencial uso como fuente de antioxidantes y colorantes naturales. Rev Cubana Plant Med 2014;19:1.
19. North MO, Bell D. Manual de producción avícola. 3a ed. El Manual Moderno. 1993. México DF. ISBN: 968-426-611-1.
20. NOM-062- ZOO-1999. Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 22 agosto 2001.
21. Burtis C, Bruns D. Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry. 6th ed. Louis, Missouri. USA: Saunders Elsevier St. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.101378.
22. Collinson P, Thomas S, Siu L, Vasudeva P, Stubbs P, Canepa-Anson R. Rapid troponin T measurement in whole blood for detection of myocardial damage. Ann Clin Biochem 1995;32(5):454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329503200504.
23. SAS. Statistical Analysis System On demand. Statistics SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA. 2024.
24. Milad R, El-Ahmady S, Nasser-Singab A. Genus Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae): a review of its ethnomedicinal, botanical, chemical and pharmacological properties. European J Med Plants 2014;4(1):86-104.
25. Tkalec M, Car D, Gospocic J, Krizaiz I, Duz K, Vidakovic-Cifrek Z. Response of Kalanchoe daigremontiana to wounding and infection with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Period Biol 2012;114:(1):83-90.
26. Korczyński M, Opaliński S, Popiela-Pleban E, Jamroz D, Kołacz R, Bubel F, et al. Influence of pulp from Kalanchoe daigremontiana on performance, egg quality and selected blood parameters of laying hens. Eur Poult Sci 2014;78:1612-9199 https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2014.71.
27. Nijveldt RJ, Van- Nood E, Van- Hoorn DE, Boelens PG, Van- Norren K, Van Leeuwen PA. Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications. The Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:418-425 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/74.4.418.
28. Williams MC, Smith MC. Toxicity of Kalanchoe spp. in chicks. Am J Vet Res 1984;45(3):543-546.
29. Kamboj A, Rathour A, Kaur M. Bufadienolides and their medicinal utility: a review. Int J Pharm Sci 2013;5:20-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-017-9525-1.
30. Yadav N, Dixit V. Hepatoprotective activity of leaves of Kalanchoe pinnata Pers. J Ethnopharm 2003;86(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00074-6.
31. Katrukha IA, Katrukha AG. Myocardial injury and the release of troponins I and T in the blood of patients. Clin Chem 2021;67(1):124-130. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa281.
32. Zhang J, Schmidt CJ, Lamont SJ. Distinct genes and pathways associated with transcriptome differences in early cardiac development between fast- and slow-growing broilers. PLoS ONE 2018;13(12):e0207715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207715.